IRAN INTERNATIONAL is transmitting in Farsi via their relay station just at the outskrits of Uzbekistan’s capital, Toshkent, with 100kW on 6270kHz from 12:00 to 04:00 UTC, directed towards Iran.
I received this station in winter as in spring. In winter (namely 16DEC2019), the whole transmission from sign-on to sign-off can be received, wheras in spring (namely 02DEC2020) a considerable part of the transmission after sign-on has been lost in the noise, plus the time towards sign-off in the morning largely coinciding with fade-out; though still celarly visible.
You see also a clear greyline enhancement at least on the fade-in. Sunrise and sunsetset for both locations can be seen from the bar chart below in the diagram..
The graphs are based on 2 x 86’400 points each, providing a time resolution of one second. To make things more clearly, the bold blue and yellow lines represent a smoothed version (moving average: 601).
This is just one example of how the actual signal strength of a station differs from season to season. With 24 hours’s recordings of the whole HF on both dates, it is easy to compare also other stations and frequency ranges. If I have time, I will add some more examples in the future.
BTW: I passed the big transmission center southwest of Toshkent left-hand, riding M39 on the way to Samarkand; it was not encouraged to take any photos …
The evening transmission of the Voice of Broad Masses from Asmara-Selae Daro in Eritrea signs on around 14:06 UTC and signing off around 18:30 UTC. Figure 1 shows the signal levels with a resolution of one second, marked by red points, and the smoothed level, yellow line, with a moving average of 601 points, or 10 ten minutes. Smoothed levels span a range from -106 dBm/Hz to -80 dBm/Hz.
There occur considerable peaks around 14:30 UTC, 16:15 UTC and 17:30 UTC. Raytracing the signal, transmitted by a Quadrant antenna HQ1/.25, will help to reveal some mechanics behind the curve.
Figure 2 shows a four-hop propagation via F1 layer at 140-160km with a relative steep elevation of about 22°. The much shorter hops, reflected at the E-layer at a height of about 100km, are of less to no importance. The signal gets through, but very weak. The path itself still is in full sunshine, see Figure 3.
There is a very short, but distinctive peak at 14:30 UTC. This coincides with a similar short time of three-hop propagation (Figure 4) from a very low azimuth of 3°. Of course, the full path still is in daylight.
Just after 16:30 UTC and near sunset at the transmitter (16:37 UTC), there is reached the bottom of kind of a “Hillary Step” before the last run to the peak. The way to a (quite short) plateau starts around 17:00 UTC. There we have a textbook-like two-hop propagation (Figure 5) with the greyline covering just more than half of the great circle path (Figure 6). There, an elevation of under 5° is needed.
Propagation on HF differs from day to day. The nine diagrams at the top show the signal strengths of China Radio International’s Kashi transmitter, 500 kW, beaming to Romania; 08:58 UTC to 09:58 UTC from March 15 to March 23. The basic resolution (black grey points in the background) is 100 milliseconds, whereas the blue line marks the moving average with 601 points. The “moving average” can be best understood as a lowpass filter, revealing possible trends on a coarser scale. In this case, you cannot see such a trend.
If you compare a part of each transmission on a much finer scale, you even see sheer chaos, as the Figure below is showing:
There seems to be no visible correlation on any scale in this case. There are other cases where, however, some correlation can be found – to which I will come back in some future entries.
The last diagram at the bottom of this pages shows a much more forgiving picture of the signal: the average level changes not more than ±4 dB between best and worst days. This so-called box diagram illustrates best the actual receiving quality of the broadcast, demodulated with an synchronous detector to largely avoid severe distortion by selective fading. The difference of deciles 90% and 10% marks the fading range, a key figure in describing the quality of reception – see “Ionospheric Radio” by Kenneth Davies [London, 1990/96, pp. 232].
Analyzing signal strenghts, is an interesting tool to get to know more about propagation. I will continue this topic – stay tuned!
Today’s SDRs plus able software allow for some new insights into propagation. The figure at the top shows but one example: greyline enhancement. It follows the signal levels on 4750 kHz with a resolution of one second. Smoothing this cloud of points, reveals the more general course of signal level. Here we see, after sign off of Bangladesh Betar, the 10 kW transmitter of People’s Broadcasting Station at Hulun Buir coming up. Most interesting is its short-living enhancement just after sunrise at Hailar in China’s Inner Mongolia, squeezed at their borders to Russia and Mongolia.
This greyline enhancement can be observed regularily on frequencies under, say, 10 MHz: at sunrise at the transmitter’s site, first the F2 layer of the ionosphere is building up, being responsible of the signal of, here, about 5 dB. The lower and attenuating D-layer needs a bit more time to build up, leaving a short-living window for an enhanced signal.
This is to encourage also other HF aficionados to to use this technique.
Ein freundlicher Leser stöberte in alten Heften der längst von zwei DARC-Leuten absichtsvoll zerstörten Fachzeitschrift “funk”. Er stieß dabei auf ein Editorial, das ich im Juli 1993 dort über “Die Grenzen des Amateurfunks” veröffentlichte. Ihr könnt es ihr hier nachlesen.
Diese Grenzen verortete ich schon damals hauptsächlich in der Betriebstechnik der Funkamateure sowie in falschen Schwerpunkten bei der Auswahl von Gerätschaften und Modulationsarten. An diesem Befund hat sich leider auch eine Generation später wenig geändert. Nur die Störungen, die uns damals schon das Leben etwas schwerer also notwendig machten, die sind nochmals stark angestiegen.
Bedauern kann man überdies, dass es heute keine Funk-Fachpresse mehr gibt, die in gleicher Weise wie die “funk” begeisternd und anregend über technische Innovationen berichtete, sie durchaus kritisch prüfte, Hintergründen – auch bei Besuchen der Hersteller bis hin in Tokio und Osaka – nachspürte, darüber professionell informierte und Monat für Monat lebhaft Werbung für unser Hobby auch unter jenen machte, die zunächst nur lose am Thema “Funk” interessiert waren. Viele von ihnen legten daraufhin ihre Prüfung erfolgreich ab, während nach erfolgreicher Zerstörung der “funk” die “Teilnehmerzahlen am Amateurfunkdienst”, wie der Begriff in aller offizieller Umständlichkeit lautet, kräftig gesunken ist. Unbedingt ein weiterer Erfolg, den sich der DARC ans Revers heften kann – gleich neben die Goldene Deppenraute mit Antenne und Brillanten 😉
On January 10, 2020, I did a round-up of VLF time stations from the Commonwealth of Independant States (CIS). They are controlled by the Russian Navy and start their main transmission on 25.0kHz. Then they change to a couple of four other VLF channels. See here for some detailed information in Russian. The diagram below shows a panorama of all received station (Khabarovsk in the Far East missing, as they skip transmission on the 10., 20. and 30. each month) on all frequencies versus time and signal level.
The diagram features a time resolution of 1s and has a resolution bandwidth of about 0.12 Hz. It is part of a 24h session, made with Winradio’s Excalibur Sigma SDR, active dipole MD300DX (2x5m) and Simon Brown’s software SDRC V3. This software delivers also the values for level over time, which were visualized and combined with QtiPlot software.
Only seemingly, Vileyka and Krasnodar are transmitting on two channels at the same time (from 07:06 UTC/11:06 UTC). This is not the case, but their transmitters show a bit wider signal in their first part of the transmission. Thus, the much weaker (ca. -30dB) “signal” at the same time, but 100Hz up, is some kind of sideband, but not the carrier!
You will see some variation of the carrier power, especially following sign on, but also during the transmission. This can bee seen with tenfold time resolution (i.e. 100ms) and magnifying the dB-scale, see diagram at the bottom as just one example. Fading can be largely excluded for several reasons, artificial characteristic of changes and VLF propagation during short periods among them.
P.S. The map at the top was made with free software Tableau Public. The locations are geo-referenced, and a satellite map as background will you lead directly to the antennas. Please try this here.
This FAX broadcast was new to me and received on December 16, 2019 at 08:20 UTC on 16557,1 kHz. It was transmitted via Shanghai Coastal Radio, presumably directed into the Pacific, of which it shows the 48h surface pressure.
It was demodulated from a 25 MHz wide HF recording over 24 hours. This recording was made with Winradio’s G65DDCe Sigma SDR, connected to an active vertical MegaDipol MD300DX (2 x 5 m), and decoded with Wavecom’s W-Code. The recording was scheduled with software SDRC V3 by Simon Brown, and directed via USB3.1 to a 20TB hard disk, WD Duo Book. The resulting one file was 8TB, format WAV RF64.
It was also played back from this hard disk, also via USB3.1. Doing so, it is most remarkable that this setup worked smoothly without any glitches which would promptly have been seen at such a time-critical mode like this FAX., 120/576. So, this reception is also a proof that one can work smoothly with such ‘big data’ even on a hard disk – and not only on expensive SSDs. A FAX transmission is that sensitive that you even see a very weak echo (best seen of the big vertical black stripe at the right which echoes from around 115° East). This originates from a mixed short/long path reception. The strong short path’ flight time is 28.7ms, whereas the weak long path needed 104.7ms. As one FAX line covers 500ms, you can easily measure the delay of roughly 80ms, almost exactly matching the difference of long and short path.